HELLO TO ALL OF YOU NEBRASKA LAMB AND WOOL PRODUCERS!

 - Dwight Tisdale, NSIA President 

It is lambing time for most of you, which makes us hopeful for a good lambing percentage and good lambing price.  The 201 assistance program appears to offer us the opportunity to achieve better lamb price through less important lamb competition.  The USDA has not published the final 201 assistant rules yet, so the exact rules are not available.  There is speculation of direct payments to reward producers for  the production of feeder lambs with superior frame size and muscling as well as for working to ensure a more even lamb production cycle year round.  By working to even the production cycle year round, the US sheep industry should be better able to fend off export displacement of their products due to the current seasonality of the US lamb industry.  There has been 10 million dollars allotted for this part of the program.  There will also be another projected 10 million dollars for producers’ loans through FSA loan programs for commodities.    Another project part of this program is a nation wide Scrapie control and eradication program.  There is a lot of frustration with the time delay with getting answers to the 201 assistant rules.  I can say with confidence, that this program will be available in the future, but we must be patient while waiting on USDA to announce the final rules.

When we look forward at producing a consistent lamb supply, I believe that the Nebraska sheep producers are in excellent position to improve the US sheep industry and meet the project goals of the 201 assistance program.  We have a large variety of sheep breeds capable of producing high quality lamb carcasses as well as lambs out of season.  With the availability of cheaper crop residues and excellent production feeds we can spread out the supply of lamb and still be price competitive.    I feel that there are excellent opportunities today in the sheep industry for profitability and Nebraska sheep producers can be a part of that.                 

Total sheep and lambs 1-1-2000 in Nebraska 102,000

ASI TO USDA: SIZE DOESN'T MATTER

 DENVER, Colo. - ASI's Board of Directors wants the USDA to know that size doesn't matter when it comes to helping the entire American sheep industry increase its competitiveness.

The USDA last week announced details of a $100 million industry assistance package that was part of President Clinton's decision last summer to help the U.S. lamb industry recover from a devastating surge of cheap lamb meat imports from Australia and New Zealand.

 The USDA's press release of Jan. 13, 2000, indicated that part of the package, $30 million in direct producer assistance payments for productivity improvements, was targeted at "small and medium-sized producers."

 "This industry needs every single producer - small, medium and large - that it can get. This much needed industry assistance package is designed - by presidential order - to help the entire American lamb industry regain its competitiveness in the face of foreign competition. No producer should be discriminated against in this assistance program because of size," said David Greene, a Maryland sheep producer with about 100 commercial ewes who represents the eastern United States on the ASI Executive Board.

 The payments as announced by Secretary Glickman are to encourage productivity and are not income support payments. With this in mind, ASI's Board of Directors was unanimous in the view that the size restriction is a discrimination against the larger operations in the industry. The directors unanimously passed a resolution urging the size restrictions be dropped from the package.

 The resolution regarding the 201 package read as follows:

 "Whereas the emphasis of the federal 201 adjustment should be on how individual projects will improve the competitiveness of the American sheep industry as a whole, and

Whereas individual farm and ranch competitiveness is obviously important, and

 Whereas the 201 funds must contribute to overall sustainable industry competitiveness and involve all operations,

 Be it resolved that ASI should encourage the elimination of any reference to size of farming and ranching operation in the dispensing of grants, loans, and/or payments as part of the 201 assistance package."

 Dr. Enrique Figueroa, USDA Deputy Under Secretary for Agriculture's Marketing & Regulatory Programs, discussed the highly anticipated trade adjustment package at ASI's recent annual convention. Dr. Figueroa said the direct payment portion of the program would require a public rule making effort.

 USDA has not provided most of the details about the package, but will be following up with ASI. It is unknown when the proposed rule on the payments will be released for industry comment. A final rule is issued after the comments are reviewed. It is unknown what producers must doto become eligible for the direct payments for productivity. Also unknown is what the application requirements, guidelines, rate or time frame of the payments will be.

 The three-year assistance package included four main areas: $30 million for direct producer assistance payments, $15 million for animal health, $15 million for government purchases of lamb meat and $5 million for marketing and promotion. Also, included were $25 million in loans for processors and $10 million in additional loan opportunities for producers.

 For more information: contact:

 Peter Orwick, Executive Director, 303-771-3500 x 35

Cathy Cummins, Communications, 303-771-3500 x 35, ccummins@sheepusa.org

Laura Gerhard, Communications, 303-771-3500 x 30

 USDA SEEKING COMMENTS ON LIVESTOCK IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM

         The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) is seeking input on a multiple-purpose universal livestock numbering system through which livestock would be identified by "official" eartags.

        "An American Identification Numbering System could be of great assistance in many areas including interstate and international movement, food safety, animal health and genetic evaluation," said Paul Rodgers, director of animal health and product safety for the American Sheep Industry Association. "It also would reduce the need for multiple identification systems and devices, thereby increasing tracking accuracy and lowering long-term tracking costs."

        ASI has worked with several groups, including the Livestock Conservation Institute, on a good ID model, and recently passed a resolution endorsing the concept and development of voluntary individual, permanent animal identification with consideration of international standards based on practicality and feasibility. The action was published in the March 3rd Federal Register. APHIS documents published in the Federal Register, and related information, such as the names of organizations and individuals who have commented on APHIS rules, are available on the Internet at

http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ppd/rad/webrepor.html

        Consideration will be given to comments received on or before May 2. Persons wishing to comment should send an original and three copies to Docket No. 99-090-1; Regulatory Analysis and Development; PPD, APHIS, Suite 3C03; 4700 River Road, Unit 118; Riverdale, MD 20737-1238.

Staff contact: Paul Rodgers ext. 65

 INTERSTATE MOVEMENT REGULATIONS

 There have been many questions regarding the  newly proposed interstate  movement regulations.  The Animal and Plant  Health Inspection Service of  the USDA has proposed a rule restricting the  interstate movement of sheep  and goats from states that do not follow effective  flock management for  scrapie. The proposed rule is a 21 page document that is  published in the  Federal Register. There have been three major proposal changes  and they  are as follows:

**Further restrictions on the interstate  movement of sheep and goats from  states that do not consider scrapie a  reportable disease or do not  quarantine infected flocks or source flocks. They  are proposing standards  describing how a state must conduct a quarantine in  order to avoid further  restrictions on interstate movement of  animals.

**Additional official identification requirements  of the interstate  movement of sheep and goats to allow for a more effective  national program  for surveillance for scrapie positive animals. The proposed  identification  requirements are similar to those of swine and  cattle.

**Reinstatement of scrapie indemnification  program for sheep and goats  that owners agree to destroy. The owners of high  risk animals and those  animals diagnosed as scrapie positive by an approved live  animal test  would be eligible for indemnity payments.

    The ASI has come out in favor  of this proposed rule change, and they  have also issued a press release that  "The proposed APHIS regulation ONLY  applies to flock owners who wish to move  sheep or goats from state to  state."

    For more information you can  go to http://www.aphis.usda.gov and  type, the word scrapie in the search engine. 

 CREEP FEEDING LAMBS

By Tom Drudik, Extension Sheep Coordinator

     In the future, profitability will be determined more by managerial decision-making than by the amount of land, labor, and capital that the farm controls.  One management decision that sheep producers will need to make is whether to creep feed lambs.  Creep feeding is a management practice of making supplemental feed available only to nursing lambs.  Creep feeding is desirable because lambs gain as much as one-third to one-half a pound per day more when their milk diet is supplemented with grain.  This practice is most beneficial to early born spring lambs that are reared in dry lots and pushed for early markets.      

     Before discussing creep feed rations, we need to have a basic understanding of the digestive tract.  The gastrointestinal tract is a complex system in the ruminant animal that begins with the mouth, teeth, and tongue and ends with the rectum.  In between the two ends of the sheep is a long digestive tract through which all ingested feeds must pass while being exposed to ruminal fermentation and digestive enzymes.  The main components of the gastrointestinal tract include the esophagus, reticulum, rumen, omasum, abomasum, small intestine, cecum, large intestine, and rectum.      

     The abomasum is the largest stomach compartment in the newborn lamb.  At birth, the reticulum and rumen are nonfunctional, so the lamb, digestively, is like the monogastric (pig or human) newborn.  The suckling process directs the milk around the rumen-reticulum directly into the abomasum.  For the rumen to develop, dry feed must be consumed.  As lambs begin to nibble on dry feedstuffs, the rumen-reticulum compartments are inoculated with microorganisms.  The microbes multiply and digest the consumed feedstuffs with the primary end product being volatile fatty acids.  The microbial digestion stimulates growth and development of the rumen and reticulum.  It enlarges greatly during the first four months after birth.  When the lamb becomes a fully functional ruminant is not exactly clear.  Although two-week-old lambs can digest some roughage, they cannot be weaned at this time.  Weaning at 50 to 60 days of age can be much more successful because the microbial population in the rumen has developed adequately to digest the amounts of dry feed necessary to support rapid growth.

            Creep feeds need not be complex.  Palatability, as well as the protein level, are keys to success of intake.  The intake level is the key to rapid growth.  In general, higher protein feeds tend to be more palatable, thus creep feeds are higher in protein.  The lambs may only require 12-14% protein, but the more successful creep feeds will be in the range of 18-20% protein.  Medication to prevent coccidiosis is recommended.       

     Many times because of convenience, medication and lack of proper mixing equipment, purchasing a commercial creep feed may be a wise decision.  Lambs tend to start quicker on feeds in a meal form and when feed is kept fresh.      

     Usually all creep rations will include an energy feedstuff, a protein source, a roughage source, and dust inhibitors or palatability enhancers.  Corn is most often used as an energy feed while soybean meal is a good protein source.  Molasses is most often used to keep dustiness down and also to enhance acceptance.  I prefer to use extruded soybean meal because of the high oil content that keeps the dust to a minimum.  The following is an example ration that can be used after the lambs have been weaned, until market.

      1062 pounds corn

      338 pounds extruded soybeans

      600 pounds alfalfa

     ------

     2000 pounds

      plus any feed additives you wish to add

      Location and construction of the creep area is also important for success.  The area needs to be accessible by the lambs and yet keep ewes out.  Sometimes a light over the creep area will attract lambs to the site earlier.

 Tom Drudik can be contacted at 308-385-5088 or TDRUDIK1@UNL.EDU

MANAGEMENT OF RINGWOMB IN EWES

        By Steve Gramlich, Extension Sheep Coordinator

Recent research conducted at West Virginia University by Nancy Kerr and Robert Dailey sheds some light onto the incidence of ringwomb that we may see occur in some Nebraska flocks.

Ringwomb is defined as a failure of the cervix to dilate at parturition.  Ringwomb causes sporadic lambing problems and the most recognizable characteristic is the protrusion of placental membrane from the vulva without noticeable signs of labor.  If uterine contractions continue to be ineffective in dilation of the cervix the placenta will separate and result in the death of the lambs.

A related problem known as early dilation syndrome (EDS) can also be a problem and must be differentiated from ringwomb.  In EDS there is an incomplete dilation of the cervix 7-14 days prior to the normal term of gestation.  The cervix will open slightly and placental membranes may be presented.  If assistance is not provided the result will be death of the lambs and septicemia, toxemia and/or death of the ewe.  Ewes that deliver on their own are often found dead from a uterine prolapse or uterine tears with evisceration.

The remainder of this article will deal with ringwomb but it is important to know which you may be dealing with.

Ringwomb is defined as failure of the ewe’s cervix to dilate at parturition.  Failure may be caused by lack of secretion of hormones that control labor or the tissue’s response to those hormones.  The condition is not due to fetal malpresentation, premature birth, diseases that cause abortion, or mineral deficiencies.  Ringwomb has no predisposed association with breed, age, or body condition score, but is associated with higher lambing percentages.  The condition has been estimated to be responsible for 15 to 32% of the cases of lambing dystocia. 

It is proposed that the occurrence of ringwomb is determined by the genotype of the fetus.  Fetuses that are homozygous recessive for the gene mutation responsible for ringwomb appear to cause the condition in the heterozygous ewe.  Although ringwomb occurs more often in ewes bearing multiple fetuses, ewes with singles have also been affected.  There is some thought that this gene may reside on the same chromosome as Spider lamb syndrome.

Recommendations for eliminating ringwomb from a flock include: culling affected ewes, culling female offspring from affected ewes, culling ewes with vaginal prolapse or a family history of vaginal prolapse, culling ewes that are carriers of the autosomal recessive disorder as indicated by its occurrence in their daughters, and culling ewes that don’t lactate well.  All previous female offspring and the service sire when the condition occurred should be culled as well.

Treatment - Early signs indicating a ewe with ringwomb are characteristic labored breathing while lying and abnormally large amounts of thick, clear, vaginal mucus discharge during the last three weeks of gestation. Prolonged manuel dilation of the incompletely dilated cervix will result in uterine prolapse, vaginal tears, and/or uterine tears.

If ringwomb is detected very early, a Caesarean section is the most effective treatment in yielding viable lambs.  Caesarean section may not be an economical treatment in most flock situations.                                 

SHEPHERD’S CALENDAR

                       Vaccinate lambs born 30 days ago with CD/T and  at weaning give booster  shot.

                      Place lambs on creep feed if not already   done -add vitamin E to the  creep.

                      Worm ewes before going out to pasture and give  first shot of vibrio.

                      Flush breeding ewes for fall  lambs.

                      Watch for pneumonia in lambs-it sets in fast  as the weather temps are  changing drastically.

                      Sell cull ewes-many people are looking for  weed eaters.

                      Do routine flock  maintenance.

                      Select replacement stock for coming year

                      Evaluate forage resources looking at pasture/range availability and harvested forage needs for the coming year.

                      Develop a drought plan if dry conditions persist in your area.

 WESTERN NEBRASKA SHEEP DAY

The new sheep alliance being formed in the Kimball, Nebraska area is holding an educational meeting for everyone interested in the sheep industry on Thursday, May 11th at the 4-H Building on the fairgrounds.  The alliance was put together to produce top lambs for the ewe market, and for year-round lamb production.  The alliance recently received a $20,000 grant through the Partners Project from Kellogg grant funds to help new producers get started in the sheep business.

The keynote speaker for the educational seminar is Dr. Daniel Morrical of the Iowa State University Department of Animal Science.  Dr. Morrical has been Extension Sheep Specialist at Iowa State since 1984.  He has been responsible for educational programs in all areas of sheep production, ranging from reproduction, genetics, nutrition and marketing.  In addition, Dr. Morrical serves as the Iowa State University representative to NCR 190 Project on Increasing the Efficiency of Sheep Production.  Dr. Morrical was heavily involved as co-developer of the National Sheep Improvement Program.

Dr. Morrical will talk about several topics including: factors that impact ewe flock profits, basics on feeding the ewe flock and the lamb crop, basic sheep health programs, demonstrations of the ration spreadsheet and “What If’s?” with the ewe flock budget spreadsheets, and finally reproductive management and out-of-season breeding.  There will also be a hands-on opportunity for participants in the sheep pens for condition scoring, aging, handling and other basics.

The event is co-sponsored by the sheep alliance and University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension.  UNL Sheep Extension Educator Steve Gramlich will also be present to address questions pertaining to regional production issues.  The registration cost for the meeting is $7.00 and includes the noon lunch.  Registration will be at 8:30 a.m. and the wrap-up discussion will be at about 3:30 p.m.  Everyone in the community is welcome to attend any or all of the presentations.  Please contact one of the numbers below to assist in planning for lunch.

For further information contact the UNL Cooperative office in Kimball at (308)235-3122 or contact Dwight Tisdale at (308)235-2246.

 To contact the Nebraska Sheep World

Kent Sayer, Editor

Steve Gramlich, Assistant Editor

Mail to:              P.O. Box 573, North Platte, NE 69103

e-mail    Kent at: ksayer@nque.com

Steve at: sgramlich1@unl.edu

Phone:   Kent 308-532-3629

Steve 308-532-2670

Fax:      308-532-2692               

suffolks,Suffolks,sheep,suffolk sheep,club lambs,Suffolk Sheep,clublambs,show sheep,showsheep,show lambs,showlambs,suffolk rams,market lambs,marketlambs,rams,ewes,lambs,wethers,suffolk ewes,suffolk lambs,4-H,4H,FFA,Drudik